47HQ
All Services

05 · AI Implementation

Fine-Tuning & Inference

Specialised models that beat general-purpose ones on accuracy and unit cost.

eval-pipeline · prod
LIVE
Eval suite · golden set
47 / 47passing
v2026.05.17
Fine-tune loss · 12 epochs0.22
Tokens trained
84M
LoRA r=16
Win-rate
+18pt
vs base
Inference
$0.21
/ 1M tok
Every release proves itself.
47hq
Duration
4–8 weeks
Team
1 principal + 1–2 engineers
Starts in
Kick-off within 2 weeks of SOW
Investment
Fixed fee · $80k–$160k

Overview

What you get

Dataset curation, fine-tuning across multiple base models, deployed inference with autoscaling, and a drift-aware eval suite.

The problem

Why teams call us

  • General-purpose models are expensive at your volume — and not better.
  • Domain-specific terms, formats, or refusals aren't handled well.
  • Drift over time is invisible until accuracy quietly halves.

Approach

How we work

  • Curate a focused dataset with a labeling rubric we co-write.
  • Fine-tune at least two base models and benchmark them honestly.
  • Deploy with autoscaling and a CI eval suite that catches drift.

Process

Week by week.

  1. 01 · Week 1–2

    Dataset

    Sampling, labeling rubric, train/eval splits.

  2. 02 · Week 3–5

    Tune & benchmark

    Fine-tune across 2 base models with eval harness.

  3. 03 · Week 6–7

    Deploy

    Inference service with autoscaling in your cloud.

  4. 04 · Week 8

    Monitor

    Drift detection, eval CI, handoff.

You're a fit if
  • A bounded task where general models cost or underperform
  • Access to representative labeled data (or a path to it)
  • Appetite for an eval harness to measure regressions
Probably not a fit if
  • Open-ended general chat use cases
  • Datasets too small or too noisy to support tuning
  • Teams unwilling to operate a model post-deploy

Deliverables

Everything we ship

  • 01Dataset curation and labeling rubric
  • 02Fine-tune across two base models, benchmarked
  • 03Inference deployment with autoscaling
  • 04Eval suite + drift monitoring
  • 05Cost-per-1k-tokens + latency dashboards

Outcomes

What you walk away with.

+15%
task accuracy vs your current baseline
−70%
cost per 1k tokens on covered traffic
Drift alerts
before accuracy drops, not after

A specialised model that beats your current general-purpose baseline on accuracy and unit cost — with a path to keep it that way.

Tooling

Stack we ship against

Model- and infra-agnostic. We adapt to your stack, not the other way around.

Llama 3MistralOpenAI fine-tuneModalBedrockvLLMWeights & Biases

FAQ

Real questions, technically answered.

Open-source or closed-source base model?
We benchmark both. The decision falls out of the numbers, not vibes.
Where does inference run?
Your cloud (AWS, GCP, Azure) or a managed provider — your call, with cost modeled both ways.
How do you handle re-training?
Eval CI flags drift; re-training cadence is part of the handoff playbook.

Next step

Ready to scope Fine-Tuning & Inference?

Book a discovery call. We'll confirm fit, sequence the engagement, and have a Statement of Work in your inbox within a week.

Refundable if we're not a fitWritten diagnostic in 48 hoursSession run by a founder, not a sales rep